News articles: appearances
Aug. 8th, 2005 09:38 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Why is that the BBC writes so much more on the Gulf than anyone else? Today it's an article on Why appearances matter in Saudi.
In other news, I just learned that Robin Cook died this weekend. Alas, poor Robin. You were one cool dude.
In other news, I just learned that Robin Cook died this weekend. Alas, poor Robin. You were one cool dude.
But in spite of all temptations / To belong to other nations...
Date: 2005-08-09 06:52 am (UTC)Qatar was a British protectorate from 1916 to 1971. By all accounts it entered this agreement quite willingly, as the alternative was trying to fend off the Ottomans, the Sauds and the Bahraini Khalifas at the same time.
From nosing around online, it looks like Kuwait, Bahrain, the Trucial states (now the UAE), Oman and Aden (later South Yemen) were all protectorates too. I guess that actually answers my longstanding question about how all these teeny little areas on the Gulf managed to withstand Saudi expansionism....
Re: But in spite of all temptations / To belong to other nations...
Date: 2005-08-09 04:48 pm (UTC)(Of course, if it weren't for the, the Sauds couldn't have conquered the Peninsula in the first place. But it's good to try to contain your mistakes.)
More likely
Also, a lot of these "nationalities" were created simply to pay off some local war-lord or ally. Take the Hashemite Kingdom of [Trans] Jordan, for example. The grandfather of the late King Hussein, "King" Abdullah bin Al-Hussein (the official biography) was actually a very prominent horse-trader who did a LOT of business with the British before and during the World-Wars. They rewarded his loyalty by "giving" him a country, the east half of the British Mandate of Palestine, which technically wasn't thiers to give. :-p
Re: More likely
Date: 2005-08-10 11:33 am (UTC)