News: Saddam, sex 'crimes'
Nov. 6th, 2006 10:16 amToday's Gulf Times has an interesting article on the local Mixed reaction to Saddam verdict. There's little consensus on Saddam, but enormous consensus on the general suckitude of the United States.
Since I am endlessly fascinated/horrified by Qatar's prosecution of consensual sex acts, there are many items of interest in today's Court Roundup. Most interesting, I think, is the story called "Illicit Relations," which informs us that a Turkish man faces death by stoning because he and his Filipina girlfriend admitted to adultery. (The woman involved is not up for the death penalty; since she's Christian, shari'ah doesn't apply to her.) "Legal sources" say that, in similar cases in the past, the guilty parties have been persuaded to retract their confessions so they don't have to be executed.
Living here makes me feel very strongly about the separation of the public and private spheres. It's a little embarrassing, I feel, when a government's laws are so invasive that it has to ask people to lie about their personal lives so it isn't forced to punish them.
Since I am endlessly fascinated/horrified by Qatar's prosecution of consensual sex acts, there are many items of interest in today's Court Roundup. Most interesting, I think, is the story called "Illicit Relations," which informs us that a Turkish man faces death by stoning because he and his Filipina girlfriend admitted to adultery. (The woman involved is not up for the death penalty; since she's Christian, shari'ah doesn't apply to her.) "Legal sources" say that, in similar cases in the past, the guilty parties have been persuaded to retract their confessions so they don't have to be executed.
Living here makes me feel very strongly about the separation of the public and private spheres. It's a little embarrassing, I feel, when a government's laws are so invasive that it has to ask people to lie about their personal lives so it isn't forced to punish them.