qatarperegrine (
qatarperegrine) wrote2009-01-13 10:28 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Maybe Bush's problem was just that he used Google.....
I was just trying to look up something about Iraq's nuclear program in the '80s, so I Googled Iraq nuclear history.
Try it.
I often appreciate that Google searches for variants on the words we input -- that if I search for tutor conference, for example, I also get webpages that talk about tutoring conferences. But someone really needs to tell them that Iraq and Iran are not synonyms!
Update, 30 January: woot, they fixed it!
Try it.
I often appreciate that Google searches for variants on the words we input -- that if I search for tutor conference, for example, I also get webpages that talk about tutoring conferences. But someone really needs to tell them that Iraq and Iran are not synonyms!
Update, 30 January: woot, they fixed it!
no subject
Bush
Yet more proof that automatic heuristics ain't everything (like the 3rd result for 'Jew' is some neonazi bozo's site. It used to be 1st).
no subject
no subject
no subject
Can you comment on the above discussion of whether this is a result of synonym-matching or stripping? (And if there's anyway to give Google feedback when it associates things that it shouldn't?)
no subject
no subject
Anyway, I LOLed.
no subject
no subject
I've noticed I type the wrong word much more often these days. I never imagined it would start so soon.
no subject
no subject
no subject