ext_171624 ([identity profile] qatar.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] qatarperegrine 2009-01-14 06:07 am (UTC)

Is that how it does it, just by associating similar things that have been searched for together? I suppose the question here is whether this happened as a result of synonym matching or as a result of word stemming. I assumed it was stripping off the n and q as suffixes like it'd know to ignore the "ing" if I searched for "running." However, I guess if that were the case, ira nuclear history would turn up the same results, and it doesn't.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting